Nothing "happened" to her. Not to belabor the point, but she was always unstable, irresponsible, and manipulative. You just were besotted by her and chose to believe the image she projected of herself and not the evidence of who she was.
I've been coming to terms with this in pieces. I think after reading this today I reflected and for the first time truly entertained the idea that she's a just net bad person whom I nonetheless fell into love with. I'm sure you know I can't just turn off that affection for aspects of her and the dreams about the life I wanted with her. And I think even the worst of us has some part of the original child, the image of God, within us for which we would benefit from being appreciated and loved. Net bad or not, she's got a lot of that, and I don't think I'm the only one to see it.
I also get the impression that you have a bad case of KISA (Knight in Shining Armour) syndrome. You see yourself as someone who can save a damsel from herself. You can't.
After that was first mentioned in this thread I looked into that and can confirm, yes. I definitely thought I could be a part of her healing because the things she seemed most traumatized by in her past were things that weren't among my problems, and I had great sympathy for her about. That doesn't correlate to "saving" her as it turns out, but when she jumped into my arms I'm sure I thought, "Ok, I will get her to safety." It's not that I thought I was a perfect knight, but I did feel like I was perfect for her.
So I'm going to ask again: Where is their father? If he's still involved in their lives, is a decent man (ie, not a criminal), and has visitation/shared custody, then he needs to be made aware of what's going on in his children's lives. If the mother of your kids were shirking her responsibilities, wouldn't you want to know? Maybe they would be better off living with him, if that's an option.
He's aware. He's kind of a jerk and somewhat narcissistic, so he's interested in getting involved in order to win the game. Still, I do think the boy would be better off with him for now regardless. It's neither my circus nor my monkeys, though.
Again, if she wants to live like a single woman while she's married to you, then she needs to assume the burdens of a single woman-- not enjoy all the perks of being married (ie, using you as a babysitting service) while she fucks around.
I'm not sure where I gave the impression that I was covering for her other than to make sure they aren't out on the street. That's what it would look like to them. Yes, things could get bad enough that I would risk it, but my overnight tears and moans and groans about not being loved anymore aren't enough to justify it. For now, by staying there she's basically put herself under house arrest because her condition for living there includes not having anyone over without my approval (including babysitters) and me not babysitting the kids either. She's stuck in the house unless she takes the kids, and she's not (yet) sufficiently psycho that she'd take them out at night. I've got a security system that I'm monitoring now and she knows it, so there's no more chance for more midnight escapades either. That stuff seems handled.
I know you don't want to screw those kids up and make them feel as if you're abandoning them but the reality is that their mother is only married to you on paper. As soon as she finds another guy who wants to be her KISA and is willing to play house with her, you will be out of the picture.
Agreed. But in showing basic affection for them they will know that I never had anything but their best interests at heart, and I will maintain my own integrity before God.
Divorce is not who I am. Again, not to say that I couldn't be forced into that, but I'm just not there yet. It's not because I hope to get her back or anything--it's just a line I've drawn. Please don't argue with me, but I believe God joined us together in the sacrament of marriage, and for now I'm holding the line on not being a part of putting us asunder legally or otherwise.
Rather than thinking that other men might be better than you, you will pity the next poor bastard that gets reeled into her spider's web.
Yeah, I can already see that.
As for distrusting women, that will be less of an issue once you focus on your own healing and self awareness and learn to trust yourself again. As you said, you've married two women that have cheated on you. That's not a statement on your value as a man but in your ability to judge a person's character.
Yeah. I do realize that a lot of it is more about trusting myself than women. Distrusting doesn't mean that I think they're all bad...it just means I don't trust my intuition enough anymore to discern the difference. I do believe that, unlike this last relationship, slow and steady will be required to win any future race.
Thanks for your candor.